Not long after I joined the IGS board, I wrote a proposal for a grant from New Voices in Journalism, which funds innovative uses of new media for furthering the goals of non-profits. My proposal included, among other things, what I called a "first-responder" group, who would commit to monitoring various news streams for stories that seem to exemplify identification, language abuse, flawed abstractions, logic mis-use, etc., and then write gs-oriented responses that they or others could then incorporate into letters to local editors, posts on forums and blogs, or even use as the basis for email campaigns.
We did not get the grant, but the idea still makes good sense, to me, anyway. I'd like to propose that This new group (which is not That) collaborate to develop something like what I had proposed. We have the forum for doing so, and the folks who can do it, and the web has progressed just that much more that it does not tax the imagination to see some of our blog postings appearing on other sites. Whatever we do will take work: reading, discussing, writing, editing, vigilance, persistence, rationality, etc.
I've attached to this post the original proposal to New Voices, so you can get a better idea of what I envisioned, to kick off discussion on what we might want to make of it.
Thoughts?
Tags:
Share
- Attachments:
-
-
▶ Reply to This